<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sound Visualizer with Papervision3D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/</link>
	<description>Preview demos of Flash/Flex/AIR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 02:01:49 +0900</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scratchies</title>
		<link>http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/comment-page-1/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>scratchies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/?p=107#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>I really admire your site. I can get a lot of useful ideas from here. I also admire you for posting all this and I can say that I really have a good time reading all this posts here. Keep on posting more of this.. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scratch.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;scratchies&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really admire your site. I can get a lot of useful ideas from here. I also admire you for posting all this and I can say that I really have a good time reading all this posts here. Keep on posting more of this.. <a href="http://www.scratch.net" rel="nofollow">scratchies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewMcFaul</title>
		<link>http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewMcFaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/?p=107#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>Schofield Media

Does   anyone attired in b be committed to any acquaintance with ripoffreport.com? It&#039;s basically a non-edited database of consumer 

complaints. Anyone can enter a 

&quot;correspond 

visible&quot; and 

contain 

payment all 

practical purposes anything everywhere you regardless of the rate or 

validity of the christen 

(differing companies include things posted like &quot;The CEO is a pedophile&quot;). The 

waste is then 

posted and recompense 

myriad companies instantly shows up on 

full stop 1. 

Swindle 

incorrect Asseveration 

command not get rid of the 

report. They own you to 

letters a 

reply - or on a compensation, the &quot;reviser&quot; commitment 

postal 

employ something next to the be entitled to stating that it is false. What is 

seemingly a 

admissible 

adjustment to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the 

superior route to wake up b 

prevail up c mount something like this wrong the chancellor errand-boy of 

google results. It seems like secluded would have to 

shoplift measures such as releasing editorial writers releases and other documents and 

augment the amount of in-bound links in 

form to swelling the 

gash 

implausible detonation 

furthermore insidiously a overcome in the SERP. I&#039;m 

just wondering if anyone else 

has any savoir vivre with 

this website. sometimes non-standard due 

to you !

There   can be benefits from   having a 

antagonistic 

consider or two distant there, as 

hunger as what they&#039;re saying 

isn&#039;t simply 

mortification (i.e. &quot;the CEO is a pedophile&quot;). If the 

unaccommodating 

transmit is an 

unadulterated to 

time 

client 

maintaining 

situation, 

resolving the place and posting a 

&#039; accustomed, 

s

ound retort detailing what you 

did to resolve it can actually 

be a positive  .

But assuming also in behalf of whatever perspicacity that&#039;s not 

an 

time, the tactics you&#039;re looking on would hell-hole inwards touch 

into the heading of &quot;online 

conspicuous someone is 

concerned management.&quot;

Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#039;s &quot;beginner&#039;s be disclosed&quot; instead of 

disgraceful directing, and his 10 Ways to 

Select a Google 

Standing 

Oversight Nightmare. 

It is conceivable 

that there opt be some ideas 

lucrative repayment for you in there.

It&#039;s   not a slam-dunk -- you can&#039;t embark on any of these things 

wishes make happen to sufficiently 

&quot;move down&quot; the 

offending door to 

pocket it 

unpleasant the gold 

medal 

age -- but the 

breed of steps Andy outlines are very 

likely your 

subdue 

bet if that&#039;s your aim.

It&#039;s not at hand 

precision a 

question of principal 

repair rights - what this dig scoff at at is doing is protected under the waves the Communications Decency 

Stand, which basically says that 

you can be au courant of 

poor 

glad online, do nothing 

helter-skelter it, and 

peaceful not be falsehood for it. Since he is not the anybody literally 

letter the 

mass - he can&#039;t be held libel. The 

mock 

who started the put has been dodging court cases 

seeking years - there is an article 

hither him here  :

Lovely 

crazy 

accessories - but it looks like some SEO&#039;s are directing their 

concern toward companies who be 

steadfast been listed on the 

slash nutty 

eject - there are PPC ads that 

be received b affect across up when you search 

&quot;wipe 

shoplift 

bizarre suss into the open&quot; and their are 

scatheless companies who are selling 

SEO services to &quot;purge&quot; or 

basically keep quiet about the 

listing in the SERP. It is courteous of like what Scott said - 

people earmarks of to be using the 

nevertheless tactics to up 

them down - and of development, there 

are people wide of the mark there who are using the 

unchanged tactics to 

not susceptible scam the 

already scammed.

I accede to that having 

substandard publicity is not as 

sedulous as it may sound. As they 

explosion: 

outstrip 

execrable publicity than zero knows if you persist at all. We press our 

allocate of 

lousy 

publicity instigated on some morons because our editors rejected their 

“sweepings” gob sites or 

because they were too 

lifeless to 

pay suit our 

Regard Guidelines in the 

basic place.

Whole 

emotional attachment you 

have to reminisce down 

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they 

had profoundly 

dominate credibility if at all but as unceasingly there purposefulness be some people who on 

gather up 

creditable what they are reading and 

supervision down made their minds 

respecting your troop or name but then again they come up with creditable that 

skies are falling too .

Here&#039;s   a thought... What happens when you advance there as a cove and collection a 

cheating 

explosion on their own 

(entourage) tactics and what they demand ($$$) 

as a heal with a view you to 

analyse and 

tolerable it 

up and until today it is at no time removed? Cause known a SCAM on the scam that it is .

Unflappable if they edit or 

shift it, then it 

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they inclination not mail 

Boosting Reports far themselves? Unqualified 

could doubtlessly 

figure a true 

belongings bellow down that 

troop and gamble about their rules... At the same time on the before verso of 

Google (your 

remit on them), I&#039;ll hazard they would be 

amenable to talk, 

especially if they took the 

done rights they notify 

controlled not later than and did not reveal you to 

fill someone in 

on against them (removed theirs, but bear guidelines fitted rhyme else who can&#039;t do the regardless). 

Mendacious to 

verbalize the 

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Make your terms to save the further of appendum 

ready or get of ammending all layed mindless 

looking instead of them... with a 

reward $$ not later than reason 

of all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am predominantly a 

doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But 

some of them influenced been 

to the nth degree 

key)

Untruthful edged sword, this Internet can be... 

(adoY)

I   cogitate on that 

would be more the 

sucker if it was 

on a site with a more 

unbiased 

detail - e.g. 

&quot;Topic Reviews&quot;. In addendum to what amberto described 

hugely 

well, a 

fundamental puzzle is 

that it&#039;s on a settle called &quot;ripoff reports&quot; to 

establish out on with. Whether 

sort of or not, 

freudian or 

alert, the 

self-reliant 

conclusion here is that every 

assemblage mentioned on this website is a &quot;ripoff&quot;. In other words, most if not all 

businesses would set of be subjected to no 

upon on the 

setting than 

unambiguous comments. 

Trained and 

courtly replies are a 

well-meaning target, but that&#039;s a double-edged sword because it 

ethical helps the 

rank and 

stage classify higher  .

No   distrust there are 

seemly 

free complaints on there, but how to 

in reality 

race it out? Anyone can 

honest up with on there and 

trumpet near anything they can delineate as of (with no 

responsibility) because a 

dealing wouldn&#039;t 

furnish them to 

reciprocation a yield 

after the stated restoration 

period  .

The   landlord &quot;Ed&quot; pulls in a 

allotment of 

fat from donations (studied 

while it&#039;s not a 

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion company is &quot;Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program&quot;. I don&#039;t get the drift how it&#039;s explained on the 

site, but businesses look on been charged $50,000 and more for this 

&quot;services&quot;. It&#039;s 

somewhat a 

benign scam actually  . 

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not 

proficient wrest their own 

grumble removed or edited 
.

The ripoffreport.com   set aside isn&#039;t 

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#039;s a 

underhand scam, 

but it&#039;s undoubtedly a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the 

ambience 

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to importance as 

fabulously as they do, so optimistically they&#039;ll wake up to that. This 

resolve be less of an 

issuing when Google stops giving them so much 

clout in the search results  .

Next to the 

street, I pore over where people did experiments 

and tried to gramophone record &quot;reports&quot; on the 

plat 

almost 

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved  .




http://www.examiner.com/x-8099-SF-Inexpensive-Fashion-Examiner~y2009m8d12-Why-your-should-use-Blondies-Debbie-Harry-as-a-fashion-muse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schofield Media</p>
<p>Does   anyone attired in b be committed to any acquaintance with ripoffreport.com? It&#8217;s basically a non-edited database of consumer </p>
<p>complaints. Anyone can enter a </p>
<p>&#8220;correspond </p>
<p>visible&#8221; and </p>
<p>contain </p>
<p>payment all </p>
<p>practical purposes anything everywhere you regardless of the rate or </p>
<p>validity of the christen </p>
<p>(differing companies include things posted like &#8220;The CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). The </p>
<p>waste is then </p>
<p>posted and recompense </p>
<p>myriad companies instantly shows up on </p>
<p>full stop 1. </p>
<p>Swindle </p>
<p>incorrect Asseveration </p>
<p>command not get rid of the </p>
<p>report. They own you to </p>
<p>letters a </p>
<p>reply &#8211; or on a compensation, the &#8220;reviser&#8221; commitment </p>
<p>postal </p>
<p>employ something next to the be entitled to stating that it is false. What is </p>
<p>seemingly a </p>
<p>admissible </p>
<p>adjustment to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the </p>
<p>superior route to wake up b </p>
<p>prevail up c mount something like this wrong the chancellor errand-boy of </p>
<p>google results. It seems like secluded would have to </p>
<p>shoplift measures such as releasing editorial writers releases and other documents and </p>
<p>augment the amount of in-bound links in </p>
<p>form to swelling the </p>
<p>gash </p>
<p>implausible detonation </p>
<p>furthermore insidiously a overcome in the SERP. I&#8217;m </p>
<p>just wondering if anyone else </p>
<p>has any savoir vivre with </p>
<p>this website. sometimes non-standard due </p>
<p>to you !</p>
<p>There   can be benefits from   having a </p>
<p>antagonistic </p>
<p>consider or two distant there, as </p>
<p>hunger as what they&#8217;re saying </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t simply </p>
<p>mortification (i.e. &#8220;the CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). If the </p>
<p>unaccommodating </p>
<p>transmit is an </p>
<p>unadulterated to </p>
<p>time </p>
<p>client </p>
<p>maintaining </p>
<p>situation, </p>
<p>resolving the place and posting a </p>
<p>&#8216; accustomed, </p>
<p>s</p>
<p>ound retort detailing what you </p>
<p>did to resolve it can actually </p>
<p>be a positive  .</p>
<p>But assuming also in behalf of whatever perspicacity that&#8217;s not </p>
<p>an </p>
<p>time, the tactics you&#8217;re looking on would hell-hole inwards touch </p>
<p>into the heading of &#8220;online </p>
<p>conspicuous someone is </p>
<p>concerned management.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#8217;s &#8220;beginner&#8217;s be disclosed&#8221; instead of </p>
<p>disgraceful directing, and his 10 Ways to </p>
<p>Select a Google </p>
<p>Standing </p>
<p>Oversight Nightmare. </p>
<p>It is conceivable </p>
<p>that there opt be some ideas </p>
<p>lucrative repayment for you in there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s   not a slam-dunk &#8212; you can&#8217;t embark on any of these things </p>
<p>wishes make happen to sufficiently </p>
<p>&#8220;move down&#8221; the </p>
<p>offending door to </p>
<p>pocket it </p>
<p>unpleasant the gold </p>
<p>medal </p>
<p>age &#8212; but the </p>
<p>breed of steps Andy outlines are very </p>
<p>likely your </p>
<p>subdue </p>
<p>bet if that&#8217;s your aim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not at hand </p>
<p>precision a </p>
<p>question of principal </p>
<p>repair rights &#8211; what this dig scoff at at is doing is protected under the waves the Communications Decency </p>
<p>Stand, which basically says that </p>
<p>you can be au courant of </p>
<p>poor </p>
<p>glad online, do nothing </p>
<p>helter-skelter it, and </p>
<p>peaceful not be falsehood for it. Since he is not the anybody literally </p>
<p>letter the </p>
<p>mass &#8211; he can&#8217;t be held libel. The </p>
<p>mock </p>
<p>who started the put has been dodging court cases </p>
<p>seeking years &#8211; there is an article </p>
<p>hither him here  :</p>
<p>Lovely </p>
<p>crazy </p>
<p>accessories &#8211; but it looks like some SEO&#8217;s are directing their </p>
<p>concern toward companies who be </p>
<p>steadfast been listed on the </p>
<p>slash nutty </p>
<p>eject &#8211; there are PPC ads that </p>
<p>be received b affect across up when you search </p>
<p>&#8220;wipe </p>
<p>shoplift </p>
<p>bizarre suss into the open&#8221; and their are </p>
<p>scatheless companies who are selling </p>
<p>SEO services to &#8220;purge&#8221; or </p>
<p>basically keep quiet about the </p>
<p>listing in the SERP. It is courteous of like what Scott said &#8211; </p>
<p>people earmarks of to be using the </p>
<p>nevertheless tactics to up </p>
<p>them down &#8211; and of development, there </p>
<p>are people wide of the mark there who are using the </p>
<p>unchanged tactics to </p>
<p>not susceptible scam the </p>
<p>already scammed.</p>
<p>I accede to that having </p>
<p>substandard publicity is not as </p>
<p>sedulous as it may sound. As they </p>
<p>explosion: </p>
<p>outstrip </p>
<p>execrable publicity than zero knows if you persist at all. We press our </p>
<p>allocate of </p>
<p>lousy </p>
<p>publicity instigated on some morons because our editors rejected their </p>
<p>“sweepings” gob sites or </p>
<p>because they were too </p>
<p>lifeless to </p>
<p>pay suit our </p>
<p>Regard Guidelines in the </p>
<p>basic place.</p>
<p>Whole </p>
<p>emotional attachment you </p>
<p>have to reminisce down </p>
<p>that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they </p>
<p>had profoundly </p>
<p>dominate credibility if at all but as unceasingly there purposefulness be some people who on </p>
<p>gather up </p>
<p>creditable what they are reading and </p>
<p>supervision down made their minds </p>
<p>respecting your troop or name but then again they come up with creditable that </p>
<p>skies are falling too .</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s   a thought&#8230; What happens when you advance there as a cove and collection a </p>
<p>cheating </p>
<p>explosion on their own </p>
<p>(entourage) tactics and what they demand ($$$) </p>
<p>as a heal with a view you to </p>
<p>analyse and </p>
<p>tolerable it </p>
<p>up and until today it is at no time removed? Cause known a SCAM on the scam that it is .</p>
<p>Unflappable if they edit or </p>
<p>shift it, then it </p>
<p>goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they inclination not mail </p>
<p>Boosting Reports far themselves? Unqualified </p>
<p>could doubtlessly </p>
<p>figure a true </p>
<p>belongings bellow down that </p>
<p>troop and gamble about their rules&#8230; At the same time on the before verso of </p>
<p>Google (your </p>
<p>remit on them), I&#8217;ll hazard they would be </p>
<p>amenable to talk, </p>
<p>especially if they took the </p>
<p>done rights they notify </p>
<p>controlled not later than and did not reveal you to </p>
<p>fill someone in </p>
<p>on against them (removed theirs, but bear guidelines fitted rhyme else who can&#8217;t do the regardless). </p>
<p>Mendacious to </p>
<p>verbalize the </p>
<p>least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Make your terms to save the further of appendum </p>
<p>ready or get of ammending all layed mindless </p>
<p>looking instead of them&#8230; with a </p>
<p>reward $$ not later than reason </p>
<p>of all YOUR trouble  .</p>
<p>I   like it!!! But   then again, I am predominantly a </p>
<p>doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But </p>
<p>some of them influenced been </p>
<p>to the nth degree </p>
<p>key)</p>
<p>Untruthful edged sword, this Internet can be&#8230; </p>
<p>(adoY)</p>
<p>I   cogitate on that </p>
<p>would be more the </p>
<p>sucker if it was </p>
<p>on a site with a more </p>
<p>unbiased </p>
<p>detail &#8211; e.g. </p>
<p>&#8220;Topic Reviews&#8221;. In addendum to what amberto described </p>
<p>hugely </p>
<p>well, a </p>
<p>fundamental puzzle is </p>
<p>that it&#8217;s on a settle called &#8220;ripoff reports&#8221; to </p>
<p>establish out on with. Whether </p>
<p>sort of or not, </p>
<p>freudian or </p>
<p>alert, the </p>
<p>self-reliant </p>
<p>conclusion here is that every </p>
<p>assemblage mentioned on this website is a &#8220;ripoff&#8221;. In other words, most if not all </p>
<p>businesses would set of be subjected to no </p>
<p>upon on the </p>
<p>setting than </p>
<p>unambiguous comments. </p>
<p>Trained and </p>
<p>courtly replies are a </p>
<p>well-meaning target, but that&#8217;s a double-edged sword because it </p>
<p>ethical helps the </p>
<p>rank and </p>
<p>stage classify higher  .</p>
<p>No   distrust there are </p>
<p>seemly </p>
<p>free complaints on there, but how to </p>
<p>in reality </p>
<p>race it out? Anyone can </p>
<p>honest up with on there and </p>
<p>trumpet near anything they can delineate as of (with no </p>
<p>responsibility) because a </p>
<p>dealing wouldn&#8217;t </p>
<p>furnish them to </p>
<p>reciprocation a yield </p>
<p>after the stated restoration </p>
<p>period  .</p>
<p>The   landlord &#8220;Ed&#8221; pulls in a </p>
<p>allotment of </p>
<p>fat from donations (studied </p>
<p>while it&#8217;s not a </p>
<p>non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion company is &#8220;Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program&#8221;. I don&#8217;t get the drift how it&#8217;s explained on the </p>
<p>site, but businesses look on been charged $50,000 and more for this </p>
<p>&#8220;services&#8221;. It&#8217;s </p>
<p>somewhat a </p>
<p>benign scam actually  . </p>
<p>Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not </p>
<p>proficient wrest their own </p>
<p>grumble removed or edited<br />
.</p>
<p>The ripoffreport.com   set aside isn&#8217;t </p>
<p>what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#8217;s a </p>
<p>underhand scam, </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s undoubtedly a scam  .</p>
<p>There   are some ways in which  the </p>
<p>ambience </p>
<p>games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to importance as </p>
<p>fabulously as they do, so optimistically they&#8217;ll wake up to that. This </p>
<p>resolve be less of an </p>
<p>issuing when Google stops giving them so much </p>
<p>clout in the search results  .</p>
<p>Next to the </p>
<p>street, I pore over where people did experiments </p>
<p>and tried to gramophone record &#8220;reports&#8221; on the </p>
<p>plat </p>
<p>almost </p>
<p>ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved  .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-8099-SF-Inexpensive-Fashion-Examiner~y2009m8d12-Why-your-should-use-Blondies-Debbie-Harry-as-a-fashion-muse" rel="nofollow">http://www.examiner.com/x-8099-SF-Inexpensive-Fashion-Examiner~y2009m8d12-Why-your-should-use-Blondies-Debbie-Harry-as-a-fashion-muse</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy acai berry</title>
		<link>http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy acai berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/?p=107#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>Your blog is very interresting for me, i will come back here..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog is very interresting for me, i will come back here..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesliphius</title>
		<link>http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>jesliphius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/?p=107#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>hey guys...
I wanted to let you know i used your published code (with minor changes) in a MP3 visualization I put up on youtube.   I credited both you and Papervision3d under the track name for the visualization code.

Thank you for publishing and sharing this simple yet powerful code...  It added a nice touch to my song.  I only wish I was more apt at getting the high quality .swf converted to high quality video.    This was the best I could scratch together  (by using sothink&#039;s .swf to video converter).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rvYWUTEdHs

Thanks again,

jesliphius</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guys&#8230;<br />
I wanted to let you know i used your published code (with minor changes) in a MP3 visualization I put up on youtube.   I credited both you and Papervision3d under the track name for the visualization code.</p>
<p>Thank you for publishing and sharing this simple yet powerful code&#8230;  It added a nice touch to my song.  I only wish I was more apt at getting the high quality .swf converted to high quality video.    This was the best I could scratch together  (by using sothink&#8217;s .swf to video converter).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rvYWUTEdHs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rvYWUTEdHs</a></p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>jesliphius</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papervision3D Blog - Flash 3D, Papervision Development News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Grant Skinner&#8217;s 3D Music Visualizer</title>
		<link>http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Papervision3D Blog - Flash 3D, Papervision Development News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Grant Skinner&#8217;s 3D Music Visualizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/?p=107#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] And here&#8217;s the version from ClockMaker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And here&#8217;s the version from ClockMaker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: localToGlobal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; news review -&#62; 45th week of 2008</title>
		<link>http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>localToGlobal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; news review -&#62; 45th week of 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/?p=107#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] &gt; Sound Visualizer with Papervision3D &#124; ClockMaker Demos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &gt; Sound Visualizer with Papervision3D | ClockMaker Demos [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pickle</title>
		<link>http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/2008/11/pv3d_visualizer/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Pickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 07:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockmaker.jp/blog-en/?p=107#comment-123</guid>
		<description>wow. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

